> Between those two I would say Colemak is better for most because It is made to have similarities with Qwerty while still being as good as Dvorak.
1KEYBOARD VS TYPEETO FULL
I've been taking attempts of learning stenotype using an open source software called plover, but I can't even type a full sentence yet. These have a huge disadvantage of a learning curve, but some people are able to input 300+wpm consistently. Either way, in my opinion, I will take Dvorak over Qwerty even if I am slower on Dvorak because of the huge benefit it gives to comfort.Įdit: I forgot to mention that there is such thing as a chorded keyboard, most commonly stenotype. But I've heard many people where they couldn't commit to it enough to get faster than Qwerty. And in theory, it makes sense these layouts will give speed benefits compared to Qwerty because there is less hand movement. In terms of speed, It is hard to say how much it exactly increases due to the lack of data, but I've experienced huge speed increases since I switched to Dvorak. Norman is also similar to Workman except for Norman is made so right hand is used more frequently assuming right hand is more capable due to being dominant for most. This layout makes it so the most commonly used keys are placed in a hand shape possibly making it even more ergonomic than Dvorak and Colemak. I personally use Dvorak though.Īnother relatively known layout is the Workman layout.
Between those two I would say Colemak is better for most because It is made to have similarities with Qwerty while still being as good as Dvorak. And they both did that as about as good as the other. Dvorak and Colemak are made to do the same thing, move commonly used keys on the home row.
0 kommentar(er)
